Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Hans Tilstra (tilstra![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 05:17:05 -0600 (MDT) |
One of the key qualities of this list vs. other discussion lists I have unsubsribed to, is it's collective discipline to stick to topics that are related to cohousing. The arguments about racism really seem more than peripheral to this. Please note that I am not suggesting that the issue itself is peripheral, just the context in which it takes place. regards, Hans http://home.vicnet.net.au/~cohouse _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Hans Tilstra, October 11 2002
- Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Elizabeth Stevenson, October 11 2002
-
Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Sharon Villines, October 11 2002
- Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Elizabeth Stevenson, October 11 2002
- Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Racheli Gai, October 11 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.