Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:34:02 -0600 (MDT) |
on 10/11/2002 7:17 AM, Hans Tilstra at tilstra [at] smartchat.net.au wrote: > One of the key qualities of this list vs. other discussion lists I have > unsubsribed to, is it's collective discipline to stick to topics that are > related to cohousing. The arguments about racism really seem more than > peripheral to this. Please note that I am not suggesting that the issue > itself is peripheral, just the context in which it takes place. I apologize for starting this by introducing the word "racist." It was not the best word to use. Better to have just explained my point that affordability will not automatically produce diversity of skin color in cohousing. Or that skin color automatically produces cultural diversity. Affordability only produces diversity in terms of demonstrated "below the average" income. In fact, affordability allows people with assets but with low income on their 1040 to buy a house at a discount. Thus affordability does not necessarily ensure socio-economic diversity. It's rainy and cold in DC so I wish someone would tell a good joke. I'm wishing for Florida sun and we still have at least two more days of rain. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Hans Tilstra, October 11 2002
- Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Elizabeth Stevenson, October 11 2002
- Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Sharon Villines, October 11 2002
- Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Elizabeth Stevenson, October 11 2002
-
Re: Re: Relevance of "isms" to Cohousing discussion list Racheli Gai, October 11 2002
- Re: Re: Relevance of "isms"-correction Racheli Gai, October 11 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.