RE: hiring labor | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:53:00 -0700 (MST) |
"J.C. Armbruster" <jcarmbruster [at] earthlink.net> is the author of the message below. It was posted by Fred the Cohousing-L list manager <fholson [at] cohousing.org> because the message included HTML ; PLEASE do not post HTML, see http://csf.colorado.edu/cohousing/2001/msg01672.html I also deleted multiple quoted previous messages and adjusted line formats. Fred -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- I suggest the concerned party stand aside on this issue. And I apologize if my following comments seem insensitive. I've gone through five years of cohousing planning, and I feel we dealt with similar issues--after enough time and discussion was spent on them, and we got down to the real issues. Your fellow cohouser is dealing with more than the desire to deconstruct classism. S/he is also, inadvertently, putting pressure on the rest of the community to put out a certain kind of service. Unless, of course, he or she is willing, gratis, to take on the monumental task of groundskeeping, by himself or herself, for the rest of the community. But if that were the case, I'd feel uncomfortable with that situation--unless, of course, they'd be willing to let me give them some form of monetary (oops--non-monetary) credit for their labors. : ) Not even the Amish can produce all their own necessities. Nor do they wish to. I can hardly think of any good or service, except for childrearing and housecleaning, in which I do not rely on someone else's labor to provide me and my family with. Shelter, food, clothing, medical services, transportation, entertainment (except for an occasional Song Circle, where we rely on others to provide our instruments, snacks, and Rise Up Singing songbooks)--it all belongs to the Great Chain of Being. I don't see any way to break out of that loop. Nor would I want to. I have never yet built my own housing, yet I am willing to live in housing others have built. And I wouldn't be willing to live in a house built with my current level of knowledge. (Can you spell "leaky hovel?") I have a smallish yard now in comparison to our house size. Largely weed-covered last year, it looks much better, since my wife and I laboriously tilled, seeded, and fertilized it, but not as good as a sodded yard. (I admit, I see sodded yards as yet another form of soil farming, and I avoid that whenever I can. I might, however, have stood aside on that issue if my wife had felt lead to have a sodded yard.) Although I enjoy weeding, there is absolutely no way I can keep up with the weeds without either a) using up all my spare time weeding, when it is better spent with my wife and kids, or b) using Roundup, which a friend expert in pesticide assures me breaks down quickly, and is the best weed control available for homeowners at this time. Perhaps, in time, we will convert our yard to more of a native plants landscape, and minimize the amount of (artificial, environmentally suspect) grass yard we have. This, however, remains a dream, and not our most important dream. How far is your fellow cohouser willing to stretch this issue? Convert all the houses to photovoltaics, and give the local power utility time off? Install composting toilets, and infinitesimally reduce the workload of the local sewer district crew? (I admit, I'm using the "reducto ad absurdum" argument here, but I feel your friend is pursuing the same line of thinking--and without considering all the blood, sweat and tears connected with such purity of heart.) I end with a counterquestion: What's the real issue here? Classism? Or discomfort at being a "boss?" Or plain old skin-flintiness? Or something else entirely? What's the real issue? 'Cause from my perspective, the weeds are gonna keep growing, and holding back for one person's sake just increases the discomfort (and dissatisfaction) for their fellow cohousers. ----- Original Message ----- From: Casey Morrigan To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Sent: 10/25/02 8:03:29 PM Subject: RE: [C-L]_hiring labor Well, that is a great question that I don't know the whole answer to. Here is a partial answer. He does not like to pay others to do work because it reinforces classism and an unequal relationship between the wage payer and the wage earner. And that we should as a community be willing to get our hands dirty and do the manual labor required to make the place run. There is more to it but that is my summary. Uncomfortable was my euphemism, not his. --- J.C. Armbruster --- jcarmbruster [at] earthlink.net _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: Re: hiring labor, (continued)
- Re: Re: hiring labor Catherine Harper, October 27 2002
- RE: hiring labor Becky Schaller, October 26 2002
-
RE: hiring labor Fred H Olson, October 28 2002
- RE: RE: hiring labor Rob Sandelin, October 28 2002
- RE: hiring labor Fred H Olson, October 28 2002
-
Re: Hiring labor Marty Roberts, October 29 2002
-
RE: Re: Hiring labor Rob Sandelin, October 29 2002
- Re: Re: Hiring labor Andrew Burgess, October 30 2002
- RE: Re: Hiring labor Rob Sandelin, October 30 2002
-
RE: Re: Hiring labor Rob Sandelin, October 29 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.