Mission and long lasting community | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:02:03 -0700 (MST) |
What Jan Ankey wrote: our community will have no community-wide shared values other than that of protecting our investment, is one of the prime arguments critics of cohousing as a community form bring up. If there is no commitment to relationship, only to economic value, then there is unlikely the ability to create a long lasting intentional Community. Yes, the buildings will last, but your identity will change, from intentional, relationship organized housing, to non-intentional housing. I have heard this argument several times from people in the communities movement, who are critics of cohousing, that the affluence of cohousing home ownership will eventually cause cohousing to become just another condo, as the community interested founders are replaced by those who pay high prices for real estate, and have much less interest, if any, in relationship building. This was even projected at one gathering I attended to be a thirty year process. That at the end of thirty years, EVERY cohousing group that reached that milestone would no longer identify themselves as a community. It was predicted that by the third generation of owners of any unit, the interest and intention to be social with the neighbors would be very low. Of course, this was just speculation, tied up with some fancy language and presented as a question, can cohousing last? It is still an interesting question. One would expect that if this thesis were correct, that the older cohousing groups would have somewhere around 1/3 of the homes occupied by people disinterested in community. That has not been the case in my community, and I am not sure it is the case of the other older cohousing group in my area. My thesis is that the community system self selects and reinforces itself independent of income levels. If there is vibrant community going on, if there are systems of community work and connection happening, that the existence of such activity would self select for those that wanted that environment. Thus, the first several years of community will indicate the future success or failure as a intentional social environment. So, to give a specific example, if you do not have success getting community meals going, and they die out in the first 3-5 years, then it is unlikely that new people moving in will get them going. The new people are selected by the fact there are no community meals and this is what they want. If they really wanted to live in a place with community meals, they would choose somewhere else. It goes the other way as well, if you have a vibrant meals program, those that choose to live there are most likely to do so because you have meals, and they want to be involved, thus they move there. So, if you are considering moving because the community mission is: our community will have no community-wide shared values other than that of protecting our investment, then you are making that change happen by moving elsewhere. Over time, all the people who find this mission untenable will move also, and be replaced by those who want that mission, and thus the community will change into that particular aspect over time. This is why I always have said: What you actually DO together, is way more important than what it SAYS you are suppose to be doing in your mission. Pay attention to what you DO, and create actions that DO the things you want to happen. Then if you really want to write a mission statement, base it on what you actually DO, not what you think you are supposed to. Rob Sandelin Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> Field skills training for student naturalists Floriferous [at] msn.com --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Re: Discrimination and political stereotypes WOLF1GDSFM, February 11 2003
- values and missions Casey Morrigan, February 11 2003
- Re: Discrimination and political stereotypes Sharon Villines, February 11 2003
- Mission and long lasting community Rob Sandelin, February 12 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.