Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (argyle![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 17:50:02 -0700 (MST) |
> Why would you stand aside on an issue like this? Preservation of political capital. My views aren't quite as marginal in a cohousing community as anywhere else I've been, but I'm still a minority opinion on many matters. (Having principles can be a pain sometimes.) I try to choose my battles carefully so people don't start seeing me as having a kneejerk objection to everything. When it's obvious nobody agrees with me, sometimes I drop a subject in order to avoid entrenching other people's positions, and bide my time, engaging in an underground educational campaign to shift the community, one member's opinion at a time. And maybe I won't stand aside. I don't like telling people no. What is it worth to me, to say no? The times I've stood firm on a necessary change in a proposal, thinking I would stand aside was an intermediate step in psyching myself up. Kay _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: [C-L] Consensus and Sociocracy, (continued)
- Re: [C-L] Consensus and Sociocracy Sharon Villines, February 12 2003
- Individual dysfunctions in the group Rob Sandelin, February 12 2003
- Re: Individual versus group needs and wants Tree Bressen, February 20 2003
-
RE: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Faria, Sheryl, February 12 2003
- Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Kay Argyle, February 18 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.