Re: Children (in cohousing and elsewhere) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: racheli (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:09:01 -0700 (MST) |
Hi Roger, I want to address some of what I think your assumptions are: 1- Noise is bad. Maybe it is, it certainly seems to be that way in this culture. In the kibbutz where I grew up there were about 500 members. All those people and their children ate dinner in one huge hall. The noise was probably unbearable (in terms of what I'd see as acceptable now), yet nobody seemed to mind. Kids in huge numbers played outside on the lawn - I don't remember ever having an adult come over to tell us to stop making noise. My point is that noise isn't considered bad everywhere. I'm not saying that if some people dislike it, there is a problem which needs to be addressed. I'm just attempting to alert you to the fact that it isn't a problem "objectively speaking". I'd like you and others to consider that while you have a problem with the kids making noise, kids often have a problem with you (and others) constantly attempting to control their behavior. They probably won't tell you that (they know who has the power), but they resent the interference nevertheless. >1) The natural tendency for crowds of kids to get louder and louder, if >only to be heard over the other kids. To buck this trend takes regular >adult supervision, which tends not to happen at mealtimes. One family >won't let their son hang out after mealtimes because he gets too revved >up and then crashes and is difficult to get into bed. The more society insists on supervising children all the time, the more they'll seem "out of control" at moments when they are left to their own devices. My opinion is that if they were allowed MORE unsupervised time, rather than less (even though this is obviously age-related), their behavior might improve. I used to spend a lot of time at public parks (with my kids who didn't go to school). The time we disliked the most was when school buses brought over school-kids. They *were* incredibly loud, often agressive and oblivious to other kids and people's needs. I think this was the result of having to sit and "be supervised" most of the day in class, and having an overload of steam (and anger) to get rid of. All people need autonomy, and this includes children. It's been interesting to me, since we moved into our cohousing community, how for so many people caring for someone else's kids means (in full, or in large part) having the right to "admonish". IMO "admohishing" might work when someone has a real, and a largely *positive* relationship with a child, (just like with adults! :) If you don't really know a kid, and the only time she has any meaningful contact with you is when you lecture her about her allegedly inappropriate behavior, why should she take you seriously? - For one thing, she doesn't sense that you take *her* seriously. You are just one more of the many adults who try to exert (what's to her is a negative) control on her life. So, the minute you turn away, she'll probably go back to what she was doing. Or perhaps not, *out of fear*. But fear doesn't inspire anyone in a positive way, and fearful people (children included) find ways to lash out. For people who are interested in reading about non-coercion and children, I'd like to recommend a few sources: Alice Miller's books ("For Your Own Good"; and "Thou Shall Not Be Aware" are two I like a lot). John Holt's books. Non Violent Communication related material: There is a video with Marshall Rosenberg about parenting. They also have a brochure on this subject, and the NVC book has relevant material. R. ----------------------------------------------------------- racheli [at] sonoracohousing.com ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Berrins, February 19 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Sharon Villines, February 20 2003
- Re: Children (in cohousing and elsewhere) racheli, February 20 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Cafine Junky, February 20 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Sara A., February 20 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Jeanne Goodman, February 20 2003
-
Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Sara A., February 20 2003
- RE: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Forbes Jan, February 20 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.