Re: Re: Work Sharing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 07:41:15 -0600 (MDT) |
On 8/22/2003 5:09 PM, "Mac & Sandy Thomson" <ganesh [at] rmi.net> wrote: > I'm not sure that our team meetings all run as well as they could and that's > an energy drain. I think the solution is to learn how to run better > meetings and to get as much work done outside of meetings as possible > (email, delegation to individual team members, etc). One of the consistent problems I see with meetings is that people do not come prepared and do no work between meetings. Team meetings actually run themselves fairly well when the participants arrive prepared and ready to move forward. Too often those most fond of meetings use them as substitutes for work between meetings. My earlier point was that this kind of behavior often gives consensus a bad name when consensus is not the problem. The problem is lack of preparation and lack of clarity in defining one's own position on the issue under discussion. In majority rule, the majority can just ignore people who arrive unprepared. In consensus, one can't. But the problem is still people arriving unprepared, not consensus. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Work Sharing Sharon Villines, September 8 1999
-
Re: Work Sharing Mac & Sandy Thomson, August 22 2003
- Re: Re: Work Sharing Sharon Villines, August 23 2003
- Re: Re: Work Sharing Cheryl Charis-Graves, August 23 2003
-
Re: Work Sharing Mac & Sandy Thomson, August 22 2003
- Re: Re: Work Sharing Berrins, August 23 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.