Re: Re: Work Sharing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Berrins (Berrins![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 14:00:08 -0600 (MDT) |
In a message dated 8/23/03 9:41:20 AM, sharon [at] sharonvillines.us writes: << One of the consistent problems I see with meetings is that people do not come prepared and do no work between meetings. >> << Too often those most fond of meetings use them as substitutes for work between meetings. >> << the problem is still people arriving unprepared, not consensus. >> This happens at several levels. At committee meetings, it may take some staring at each other until someone volunteers to do a certain task. Some volunteers either do a half vast job or none at all (most do fine, BTW, but that's not the problem). But one of the biggest problems is poor publicity on issues for general meetings and then expecting the general meeting to rubber stamp committee decisions. Part of good prep for general meetings is plenty of early warning of the upcoming issue; a slew of paper in people's cubbies and posted next to the mailboxes outlining the issue way ahead of time, along with a few emails. Committee members can also talk up the issue ahead of time. It's not enough to zip out an email or just post it on a bulletin board with two days lead. I find that good advance publicity cuts way back on people coming unprepared to general meetings. It also helps if the general meeting has had some discussion on the topic prior to the decision-making meeting. Good advance warning gives the committee time to get feedback before they make their pitch. As for meetings, you'll always get people who arrive unprepared and without a clue. These are the folks who arrive late reading the handout on their way in (or saying "What handout? Where can I get one?"). They think they've done well enough just showing up at the meeting. But while just going to meetings, IMHO, is not enough to pull your share of work, it's still necessary and time out of your life. Meetings are just another form of community involvement. Other people hate meetings and are willing to do the physical labor or planning work, and let others make decisions. But those folks get to plan their work around their schedules, while going to meetings requires working your schedule around the meeting times, which is much less convenient. So just as it's not fair to just go to meetings and not do any work in between, it's also not fair to just do work in between and ignore meetings. While I'd rather see people doing a blend of volunteer work and meetings, I'll be satisfied if we achieve a balance of folks who just go to meetings and other folks who just do work, so long as the work gets done and the decisions get made, and nobody gripes about what the others did (woof!). Roger Pathways Cohousing Northampton, MA Where the heat and rain have temporarily tapered off and its just a gorgeous day outside. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Work Sharing Sharon Villines, September 8 1999
-
Re: Work Sharing Mac & Sandy Thomson, August 22 2003
-
Re: Re: Work Sharing Sharon Villines, August 23 2003
- Re: Re: Work Sharing Cheryl Charis-Graves, August 23 2003
-
Re: Re: Work Sharing Sharon Villines, August 23 2003
- Re: Re: Work Sharing Berrins, August 23 2003
-
Re: Work Sharing Mac & Sandy Thomson, August 22 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.