RE: Consensus: late blocks (TR Ruddick) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dave & Diane (coho![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:00:02 -0700 (MST) |
I agree that it's wrong-headed terminology and wonder what terminology
you would use to replace it.
--Diane Simpson JP COHOUSING 617-524-6614 P.O. BOX 420 BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS HTTP://WWW.JPCOHOUSING.ORG "The people who surround you define the quality of your life."= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 01:00 PM, TR Ruddick wrote:
The basic problem here seems not to be whether someone may "block consensus"--I do so wish we'd quit using that wrong-headedterminology!--but whether the person who objects has been properly informedabout the decisions that were made.
_______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
RE: Consensus: late blocks (TR Ruddick) Dave & Diane, February 1 2004
-
Re: RE: Consensus: late blocks (TR Ruddick) Ann Zabaldo, February 2 2004
- Re: RE: Consensus: late blocks (TR Ruddick) Sharon Villines, February 2 2004
- Re: RE: Consensus: late blocks (TR Ruddick) Dahako, February 2 2004
- Re: RE: Consensus: late blocks (TR Ruddick) Rob Sandelin, February 2 2004
-
Re: RE: Consensus: late blocks (TR Ruddick) Ann Zabaldo, February 2 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.