RE: decisions,eternal questions
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferousmsn.com)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:08:45 -0700 (MST)
We just let whomever pretty much have what they ask for. As far as I can
recall, only a couple times in the last many years has the group said, no
thanks to any proposal that improves our community. Our problem is we have
little leadership energy for much outside of teams, so in effect, teams do
all the work and improvements.

Rob Sandelin
Sharingwood
South Snohomish County at the headwaters of Ricci Creek
Sky Valley Environments  <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm>
Field skills training for student naturalists
Floriferous [at] msn.com


-----Original Message-----
From: cohousing-l-bounces+floriferous=msn.com [at] cohousing.org
[mailto:cohousing-l-bounces+floriferous=msn.com [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf
Of LouHarr [at] aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 10:55 PM
To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org
Subject: [C-L]_ decisions,eternal questions



I'm from Two Acre Wood in Sebastopol,Ca

I'd love to have some of your group wisdom. Every year our budget has some
discretionary money that we use for capital improvements. It's not a lot, a
few
thousand dollars.

We have a "wish list "of desireable things and some value criteria to refer
to. We also check for ready leadership and energy for a project.

I'd like to know how (what steps, process) other communities use to decide
which ones to fund. The money availible may change, so we need a group of
OK's
or a ranking

I will be happy to learn from you.    Louise  Harris.
_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list   http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:

_________________________________________________________________
Cohousing-L mailing list   http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.