Re: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer (admin![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:00:13 -0700 (PDT) |
Craig, Bluntly: your interpretation is wrong. I would like to encourage people starting to GO FOR MORE COMMUNITY whereever they happen to live now. Here is the twist: Communes are good. Permaculture is good. Neither is mainstream, they are pretty good though. What I was talking about is that I'm trying to reach the mainstream with the concept of cohousing. Even in the Cohousing book, McCamant and Durrett argue that one of the communities is so attractive because it's just slightly deviant from mainstream single family homes - with better site plannin they could achieve many benefits of building a community. Craig Ragland <craigragland [at] gmail.com> wrote: Marta, my interpretation of your mail is that "we" are better off if cohousing is distanced from values which are not mainstream enough, i.e. recycling is ok, permaculture is not. Cohousing is good, Communes are not. This doesn't reflect my values - I am proud to live in an intentional community which uses the cohousing model. This is quite different from some "Cohousing development" - our housing is secondary, our community is primary.
-
Fwd: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 2 2005
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Craig Ragland, September 2 2005
- Re: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 2 2005
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Craig Ragland, September 2 2005
-
RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Fleck, September 2 2005
- RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 2 2005
-
RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Rob Sandelin, September 3 2005
- RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 3 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.