RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fleck (foam4u![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:27:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi Marta, (I'm assuming this is a serious thread and not just bait.) My experience with our coho group is that most of our members joined because of the people, the community and the envirnomental concerns we shared and were totally disinterested in the infrastructure. The concept of "building homes for people" was definitely secondary. Some people had to really stretch to pay for their places and still stuck it out. The challenge of process, interaction, consideration and compromise has created a vibrant environment. Most of the people I know who've chosen condos did so for location and price and could care less about community. In fact, the less interaction they have with their neighbors, the happier they are. In our community, if someone misses a few dinners, we start worrying if everything's OK. I think you have to be born with a "meeting gene" to enjoy that aspect of either living situation but I expect cohos, on average, get a better turnout that condos. The interaction is often frustrating but growth-filled. What do you see as the benefit of making cohousing more "mainstream"? Why do you feel it's important to not reduce the standard of living? How would you define that? Just curious. Anne at Jackson Place Seattle -----Original Message----- From: Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer [mailto:admin [at] concordiacohousing.org] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 2:32 PM To: CoHo-L Subject: Fwd: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Rob Sandelin <floriferous [at] msn.com> wrote: To remove the notion of community from cohousing, renders it something entirely different than what it is. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Rob, Hey, hey, slower with the judgment! Let's sit on the horse the other way, shall we? I wasn't gonna remove the notion of community from cohousing, rather was pondering to attempt, at least in my condo complex, adding the notion of community to condos. Condos are an ecological choice, compared to single family houses or macmansions. Other affordable housing options should not be poo-poo-ed on this forum... Oh, participatory design process, consensus, and all, it's great, but essentially, we're talking about housing, aren't we? You said, without community, cohousing has no point. And without housing, cohousing has no point either. We are talking about building homes for people. And I think by now no one could trademark the word cohousing, if you want to discuss this, we could... on another thread. Marta R. Vanegas Community Organizer Concordia Cohousing admin [at] concordiacohousing.org www.concordiacohousing.org "Be the change you wish to see in the world" - Mahatma Gandhi Cohousing - Building an Old Fashioned Neighborhood in a New Way _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
Fwd: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 2 2005
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Craig Ragland, September 2 2005
- Re: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 2 2005
- RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Fleck, September 2 2005
- RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 2 2005
-
Re: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Craig Ragland, September 2 2005
-
RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Rob Sandelin, September 3 2005
- RE: RE: [C-L]_ HOAs in Cohousing Marta Vanegas, Concordia Organizer, September 3 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.