Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Andrew Netherton (andrewnetherton![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 09:58:39 -0800 (PST) |
On 2/20/07, Stuart Joseph <stuart [at] caercoburn.org> wrote:
I think we might be getting too paranoid here.
And a bit too complicated too. I never thought this would turn into an discussion about copyright when I volunteered for this. However, I think there's a solution that can appease everyone. The document library will be made up of all documents submitted to the wiki, and will likely be made up of a hierarchy of wiki pages. To make things simple, there will be three sub-categories for each type of document: documents that are public domain, documents that are copylefted (some rights reserved), and those that are copyrighted. All will be available to look at, and it will be up to the individual/group using the documents to get the proper level of permission. Can anyone see downsides to that? (Other than the aforementioned insurance big brother issue, of course.) Andrew Netherton Laurel Creek Commons Waterloo, ON, Canada http://andrewnetherton.wordpress.com
- Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL?, (continued)
- Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL? Catya Belfer-Shevett, February 19 2007
- Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL? Tim Mensch, February 19 2007
- Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL? Catya Belfer-Shevett, February 19 2007
- Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL? Stuart Joseph, February 20 2007
- Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL? Andrew Netherton, February 20 2007
- Re: sample document library: copyright, copyleft, CC, GPL? Raines Cohen, February 20 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.