Re: Secrecy in Cohousing Records | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Deborah Mensch (deborahmensch![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:05:41 -0700 (PDT) |
I agree that it's reasonable for anyone to be able to view the records -- I used to be in charge of checking the pool and spa at my former community (Pleasant Hill Cohousing, Pleasant Hill, CA). The records weren't posted on the wall, but the clipboard where they were kept was in an unlocked area where anyone could check it if they chose. The purpose of the health department monitoring pools is to ensure the safety of those using them. In Pleasant Hill, a health dept. inspector would only come by a few times per year, to check that we were doing things correctly and that the physical condition of the premises was safe. Not exactly close monitoring -- that's the job of those doing the daily checking. I would add that the process of checking chemical levels is not complicated. If a community member has a special interest in the levels in the pool/spa, he or she could learn to check them -- and perhaps become part of the team that does so regularly. The adjustment of chemicals is probably better left to a small number of people (my opinion -- because some of them have effects that kick in over several hours or days, so if the people making adjustments aren't pretty well coordinated, they can end up messing up each other's work inadvertently), but checking is no big deal. If someone in the community is really unwilling to make the records open and you decide not to fight that battle, you can even buy your own jar of instant test strips at a pool supply store and bring it with you when you want to use the pool or spa. But read the next paragraph first!! I have some sympathy for those who adjust the chemical levels and may not relish the thought of having lots of people checking their work. It's not an exact science, and there may be community members who think they could do it better and are not hesitant to say so, thus making those doing the adjustments feel criticized and undervalued for their effort. It might help to explore why those in charge of the records are reluctant to make them accessible, and to be sure that the desire of others to check the records is not about "I don't trust you to keep us safe" but about "I understand this is a tricky business and things don't always work out as intended, and I'd just like to be able to reassure my visitors if they have questions about the chemical levels. By the way, is there anything I can do to help with pool/spa maintenance, that might make it easier for you?" An atmosphere of mistrust can make anyone want to do things that look crazy from the outside. Offering help and understanding rather than criticism will ease many conflicts of this type. My two cents, Deborah Mensch Wild Sage Cohousing, Boulder, CO On 9/16/07, Jenny Williams <jlgw [at] cableone.net> wrote: > > It seems a very reasonable request to have all those levels posted for > everyone to see. > > jenny > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: O3C11N6G [mailto:normangauss [at] charter.net] > > Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 10:41 PM > > To: Cohousing-L > > Subject: [C-L]_ Secrecy in Cohousing Records > > > > > > I have encountered in our cohousing community a reluctance to display > > results of inspections and records of our spa and pool. > > > > Our pool and spa are supposed to be checked by a rotating group > > of 7 people > > once a day every day for safe levels of chemicals and we have occasional > > inspections by the local public health service. Anytime a large > > team sets > > up a rotating schedule for doing anything, it is likely to have a > > degree of > > non-compliance. We have a similar rotating duty roster for > > locking up the > > common house at night and it often fails. > > > > In determining whether the spa is being maintained for my guests, I have > > asked to have the chemical readings of the spa and pool posted. The > > committee chair has refused, explaining that those records are for the > > public health service only, and I am not privy to them. I am not > > confident > > that the chemicals in the spa and pool are being maintained at their > > recommended levels because I have seen first hand how difficult > > it is to get > > non-technical trained in testing and recording their test results. > > > > Does anybody out there in cohousing land have any views on this? > > Is it too > > much to ask that testing results be displayed so that if I want > > to invite my > > guests, we do not have to be concerned that the spa or pool might not be > > safe today? > > > > Norm Gauss > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: Revisiting Consensus, (continued)
-
Re: Revisiting Consensus Oliveau, September 13 2007
-
Closed Meetings O3C11N6G, September 15 2007
- Secrecy in Cohousing Records O3C11N6G, September 15 2007
- Re: Secrecy in Cohousing Records Jenny Williams, September 16 2007
- Re: Secrecy in Cohousing Records Deborah Mensch, September 16 2007
- Re: Secrecy in Cohousing Records O3C11N6G, September 16 2007
-
Closed Meetings O3C11N6G, September 15 2007
- Re: Secrecy in Cohousing Records Michael Barrett, September 16 2007
- Re: Secrecy in Cohousing Records Racheli Gai, September 16 2007
- Re: Secrecy in Cohousing O3C11N6G, September 16 2007
-
Re: Revisiting Consensus Oliveau, September 13 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.