California co-housing legislative alert | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: nospam (nospam![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:57:20 -0700 (PDT) |
***NOTE: SEE EMAIL REPLY INFO BELOW***California co-housing communities are regulated, in part, by the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civil Code Sec. 1350 et seq.). The legislature has asked the California Law Review Commission to study and recommend changes to the law that would "simplify and clarify" its provisions. It is likely that their final recommendation will be introduced as a bill soon.
The current law shows little understanding of co-housing communities. Many provisions do not make sense for these communities and others are hostile. We have a chance to educate them and show them that there is a constituency. They have sent out a draft of a new law for public comment and the comments are due this Friday. After receiving these comments and holding a meeting, they will issue a final recommendation to the legislature. This might be as early as January.
Among other things, the existing law or draft requires: - A thirty-day balloting period for the election of directors; - The required use of cumulative voting if it is an option in the bylaws; For complete info on the draft, see clrc.ca.gov/H850.html .Info for commenting on the draft is on the website. One way is to send an email to their executive director: Brian Hebert bhebert [at] clrc.ca.gov . This will go into the public record. You can also call him for information at 916-739-7071 to chat, but this will not go into the record. I am the only co-op member in the entire state who is currently commenting on the draft. A few emails would make a big difference. Brian is interested in listening and considering our concerns. He has already recommended many changes based on my comments. I can be contacted by email (see end of this message) or by phone at 510.644.2463
Bob Walnut House Co-op A sample email to him could be something as simple as this:I live in/am on the board of <name of co-ho>. We would like the Commission take into account that there are many co-housing developments in California. <Our association has the following features: small/everyone is on the board/we have no declaration, etc.> I would like to suggest that the Commission become familiar with the diverse ways that co-housing communities are organized and make sure that the final recommendation supports us and is clearer and simpler for us to use, without consulting with an attorney.
<more optional stuff> Thank you for your consideration, ====================*EMAIL REPLY INFO* - The archives for co-housing-l are on a publicly accessible website and the sender's email address is fully exposed. To avoid spam, the header of this message does not have my real address. To reply to me, please use:
a;ls@kfkl;asdf bob ;lskdjf;lakj a;lskdj;lkdsj at a;ls@kjfk;alkj ;alskjfdsj bobsheppard ;alskj ;als@kdjfk dot a;ls@kjfl;kd a;lskdf org ;alsk@jf;al
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.