Re: Tragedy of the commons | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:40:22 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sep 27, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Kay Argyle wrote:
The areas in which we have avoided this is when a single person or a small group essentially makes a common facility their own. The facility is available for everyone to use but the individual person coordinates and largely makes the rules on how it will be used. This is done in a consensual manner but without that one person who exerts strong leadership and does a lot of work or gets other people to do a lot of work the facility declines.Aren't you describing a benevolent dictatorship?
I think not because the person can be overruled at any point -- and some people have been. People sort of cycle through jobs until something sticks.
Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing,Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Tragedy of the commons, (continued)
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Kay Argyle, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Lyle Scheer, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 28 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Lyle Scheer, September 28 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Tim Mensch, September 28 2007
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.