Re: Tragedy of the commons | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lyle Scheer (wonko![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:08:43 -0700 (PDT) |
Sharon Villines wrote: > On Sep 27, 2007, at 7:36 PM, Kay Argyle wrote: > >>> The areas in which we have avoided this is when a single person or a >>> small group essentially makes a common facility their own. The >>> facility is available for everyone to use but the individual person >>> coordinates and largely makes the rules on how it will be used. This >>> is done in a consensual manner but without that one person who exerts >>> strong leadership and does a lot of work or gets other people to do a >>> lot of work the facility declines. >> Aren't you describing a benevolent dictatorship? > > I think not because the person can be overruled at any point -- and > some people have been. People sort of cycle through jobs until > something sticks. I guess that means it's a benevolent easily overthrown dictatorship, but someone has to be dictator. - Lyle
- Re: Tragedy of the commons, (continued)
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Kay Argyle, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Lyle Scheer, September 27 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 28 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Lyle Scheer, September 28 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons Tim Mensch, September 28 2007
- Re: Tragedy of the commons John Beutler, September 28 2007
-
Re: Tragedy of the commons Sharon Villines, September 27 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.