Re: Borda Count
From: Tim Mensch (tim-coho-lbitgems.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Craig Ragland wrote:
The whole idea of Borda seems more tied to supporting groups where there is
some sense of competition about who's providing leadership - not co-creative
approaches where leadership is more explicitly shared or collaborative.
Someone still has to be chosen by the group as the person the group trusts to, e.g., write checks from the group account (treasurer), or to fill the largely-but-not-entirely token role of President of the Board to satisfy your legal requirements as a corporation. Yes you can select those people by some kind of consensus meeting (or via sociocratic elections), but at the end of the day you are legally required to fill those rolls--and if nothing else, Borda count gives you the ability to choose the person who has the most approval from the most people, which is as close to consensus as you can get without sitting down and arguing about the details for hours.

Tim

--
Tim Mensch

Currently at Wild Sage (Boulder, CO): http://www.wildsagecohousing.org

Founding member of Tumblerock, a Boulder, CO area community in its forming 
stages: http://tumblerock.org


Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.