Re: Borda Count | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bb![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:35:45 -0800 (PST) |
> So while the Borda Count promotes candidates who are are more > broadly accepted in a community, is it really necessary if the > community uses collaborative decision-making? If your decisionmaking process is as collaborative as you think it is, then Borda Count will return the same results. These types of voting systems give you a numerical measurement of who claims to agree and how much. Perhaps every non-unanimous decision should be announced with: 'and the other 47 of us agree that we're going to gang up and force Sam to eat Lima beans, which he hates'. If it's uncomfortable to say, that's a hint that it should be even more uncomfortable to do. Brian
- Re: Borda Count, (continued)
-
Re: Borda Count Robert Heinich, February 13 2008
-
Re: Borda Count Craig Ragland, February 13 2008
- Re: Borda Count Tim Mensch, February 13 2008
- Re: Borda Count Craig Ragland, February 13 2008
-
Re: Borda Count Craig Ragland, February 13 2008
- Re: Borda Count Brian Bartholomew, February 13 2008
-
Re: Borda Count Robert Heinich, February 13 2008
-
The special powers of a board Rob Sandelin, February 13 2008
- Re: The special powers of a board Sharon Villines, February 13 2008
-
Re: Borda Count Sharon Villines, February 13 2008
- Re: Borda Count Craig Ragland, February 13 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.