Re: community communications: how to do it | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ellen Keyne Seebacher (elle![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:29:50AM -0400, Sharon Villines wrote: > The one thing we did at Takoma Village that has helped enormously > was to establish one bulletin board in the frint hall of the CH as > the place where all current and emergency information that is > relevant to everyone can be found. Wow. That would so not work at Mosaic Commons, where we have members who are world travelers and some, like me, who are lucky to get to the Common House once or twice a week. (I live in the farthest unit from the Common House and I'm partially disabled, so incentives have to be fairly high to get me to limp over there, especially in bad weather.) We use email for almost all Mosaic business, and we're lucky enough to have the equipment and the technical know-how to run our own servers, so we're not dependent on a company like Yahoo! for archives or list management. It also helps that almost everyone in the community is reasonably comfortable using email. We have an extensive Web site with some member-only sections; a wiki for team use, commuter info and agenda items for general meetings; a database server for keeping track of marketing contacts and our decision logs; and Google Calendars for reserving spaces in the Common House. We also have (in addition to cubbies for households and boxes for US mail) mail slots for inter-household use, and a credenza in the Common House "Hub" where people leave brochures and the like that might be of community interest. There's a bulletin board in our Hub, too, but it's mostly used to sign up for meals and cleaning shifts. > We have some "email should be absolutely banned from the face of the > earth and is the source of all evil" and some "email should be > required because it is inclusive and is the reason we are able to > tolerate diversity at all" people. The evil power that is ascribed > to email is matched only by the glorification of face-to-face. The > contradictions in the logic I find mind-boggling. I don't understand that either. We have one ad-hoc team where some members insisted that it was impossible to transact that project's business via email, but none of the face-to-face-is-better folks seemed eager to hammer out a single meeting time that would accommodate everyone -- so that project's been sitting on a back burner for months. I believe we could have settled the whole thing via email in a week or two. :( Also, this fall the community decided that every one of our lists should have its Reply-To: settings changed to reply to the poster, rather than the list. While this has cut down on random "me too!" and "thanks" clutter (and meal signups sent to everyone, instead of the chef), it's also cut down significantly on group discussion, because comments moved off-list. Several times in the last couple of weeks I've had to say "did you mean that for just me or for everyone?"; it'll be interesting to see if that continues over the longer term. Ellen Seebacher Mosaic Commons / Sawyer Hill Ecovillage (Berlin, MA) -- Know someone who'd love green community living? Refer them to us, earn a finder's fee! Go to http://sawyerhill.org/1000 to learn more.
-
community communications: how to do it Jude Foster, October 30 2010
-
Re: community communications: how to do it Sharon Villines, October 31 2010
- Re: community communications: how to do it Chris ScottHanson, November 1 2010
- Re: community communications: how to do it Ellen Keyne Seebacher, November 2 2010
- Re: community communications: how to do it Sharon Villines, November 3 2010
- Re: community communications: how to do it Moz, November 4 2010
- Re: community communications: how to do it Ann Zabaldo, November 4 2010
- Re: community communications: how to do it Sharon Villines, November 4 2010
-
Re: community communications: how to do it Sharon Villines, October 31 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.