Dynamic Governance & Unions [was hotel/ union ] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:07:30 -0700 (PDT) |
On 4 Apr 2011, at 7:27 PM, R.N. Johnson wrote: > Just to give a little background, anti-union management often ask for a > secret ballot, because this gives them an opportunity to stall the election > for months and years, intimidating workers in the meantime. I'm not sure why this stalls the election. Unions want secret ballots and in some states the election is not legal if the ballots are not secret. The intimidation is huge if management can determine who voted for the union and who against. There are good procedures for determining that a vote has been legally cast and counted. === In The Netherlands where unions are mandatory, sociocratic, dynamically governed businesses are exempt because the workers are better protected than with a union. They become part of the decision-making and budget process. All workers receive both market rate wages and what we call bonuses that are based on company profits. Sharon === Sharon Villines SocioNet: Network for Sociocracy, Governing by Consent http://www.socionet.us
-
hotel/ union R.N. Johnson, April 4 2011
- Dynamic Governance & Unions [was hotel/ union ] Sharon Villines, April 4 2011
- Culture Against Society and the Soul of Cohousing? Re: Dynamic Governance & Unions [was hotel/ union ] Wayne Tyson, April 4 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.