Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Wayne Tyson (landrest![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:39:59 -0700 (PDT) |
Honorable Co-housing Forum: Moz said:"Can we please all try to stay civil? I agree that it can be hard to deal with other people sometimes, but one of the things I value about cohousing is that everyone seems so polite. Yes, we argue and fight, but people mostly listen and respond with thought and care. This might be an illusion, but as a favour to me can everyone play along?"
I don't know what the rules (humor incidental, but not avoided) are for this forum, but I prefer to infer that decorum is the norum. However, whether or not a post is civil is not a rule in my personal book. (I do understand the plight of a moderator and others who are forced take time to supervise the playground, as it were, to keep kids from breaking each other's bones [That has happened to me.]). I think it's fine for people to express themselves, because we all must accept responsibility for what we say (especially what we write, which becomes a permanent record). No one of us, worldwide, is perfect, though self-righteousness seems to be a popular state of mind. I don't mind if folks are uncivil, but I don't always mind them. If one makes a good point nastily or lovingly, I'm equally likely to get the picture and be affected by it. Feedback is always a learning experience, and one or both of the parties can learn something about the other--and about themselves.
I'm not "rule-averse," I just have trouble with presumption. I'm pro agreement and in favor of people working out problems when they are encountered, before they get all puffed up out of proportion with resentment. I actually like to be corrected when I am wrong--it helps me grow. But I never know what to do with generalized grumbles. How can one possibly improve without knowing specifically what is bugging someone? I don't see the need to argue and fight, but I do agree that forum discussions should stick to what's relevant to the issues at hand. Shutting off relevant discussion without, well, discussion, is, well, (shut my mouth).
WT
-
Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Jerry McIntire, May 18 2011
-
Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Kay Argyle, May 19 2011
-
Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Moz, May 19 2011
- Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Wayne Tyson, May 19 2011
-
Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Moz, May 19 2011
- Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Wayne Tyson, May 19 2011
-
Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Kay Argyle, May 19 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.