Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kay Argyle (Kay.Argyle![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:52:49 -0700 (PDT) |
"... anti-social communication occurs when you don't attend to the desire of a group to stay on their topic." Please speak for yourself. Claiming to speak for a group is a manipulative technique. The proposal John asked for feedback on had a linkage between common house usage and participation that is (in my 13 years' observation of cohousing) unusual. The ensuing discussion about the place and efficacy of rules and requirements in community would have been better for an early change in subject line (mea culpa among others; sorry, kindly moderator); nonetheless, it was not off-topic for the list itself (as witness many similar threads in the archives), and obviously others besides Wayne found it of interest. "Less please." I will agree that Wayne might communicate his ideas better if he could make them more concise. It's a skill I have struggled to acquire myself. On the other hand, asking him to "please stop taking up so much space on this forum" seems excessive. His right to participate is equal to yours. You don't need to read his messages if you don't want to. Is your delete key broken? Kay Argyle Wasatch Commons
-
Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Jerry McIntire, May 18 2011
- Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Kay Argyle, May 19 2011
-
Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Moz, May 19 2011
- Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Wayne Tyson, May 19 2011
- Re: Communication Social and Anti-social? Wayne Tyson, May 19 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.