Re: Parenting in Cohousing
From: Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah (welcomeolympus.net)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Port Townsend WA, long-established community.
This is a front-burner issue at RoseWind these days, but from a different angle. We had a rule that 13 and under couldn't be in the Common House (CH) unsupervised, except just to do something like pick up mail. They we had a family move in, with a calm studious 13 year old. She wanted to cross the street to the CH and curl up with a book, away from her noisy younger siblings. Seemed like a no-brainer to say OK, 13 could be in the CH on their own. Then a few years later, one of the group of young boys became 13 and would be found, with his younger sibs and with non-RoseWind kid friends, not just 'in the CH' but there for the purpose of playing violent video games on the big screen monitor.

We had no rules about whether a permitted 13 could then qualify as supervision of others. Never came up before.

AND we had some folks intensely upset to see CH space used for games like Halo, with tanks blasting "soldiers" dead.

Various meetings with parents and nonparents led to quite a spectrum of beliefs getting expressed. Some of our families consciously choose to give their children more liberty than folks like me think is appropriate. Those parents ask that we "treat the kids like anyone else" and let them be "innocent until proven guilty", and "let them learn from their mistakes." On the other end are those - mostly nonparents - who feel that graduated privileges go with graduated maturity of judgment, We've had various instances of damage in the CH that sure looked like kid doings: kids' names scratched on porch furniture, written on the bulletin board surface, ping pong paddles with the rubber all peeled off, a pushed out screen in a bathroom window, ping pong balls crushed. Nothing huge, but there are those who say we can't prove it was kids, and we don't want them to feel singled out for criticism and judgement. That it would be bad to require the kids to make it right.

The upshot of all this is that we accepted that kids ARE using the CH unsupervised, so we should try out letting that be ok, at the discretion of the parents. (There seemed to be some agreement they shouldn't be in the kitchen unsupervised. We already have a well- observed rule against leaving any alcohol in the CH between gatherings. )

The violent video game bit is still being worked on by a task force. Some are as adamantly against any form of censorship, as others are sure that allowing such video in the CH is training the children to be killers and think violently. (The games belong to the kids and their parents allow them.) I'm not sure where this is leading, but it's definitely "up" -- the whole matter of how much and how other adults should play roles in the kids' lives. Most of the kids circulate in groups of kids, with relatively little apparent interest in being or becoming part of the community. Some of their parents don't participate much either.

Maraiah Lynn Nadeau





Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.