Re: Pet policy | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:00:53 -0700 (PDT) |
On 24 Apr 2012, at 8:35 AM, Lautner, Patricia wrote: > * Pet owners will respect the needs of other members of the community > with regard to noise and defecation) You might add fear of pets, not just noise and defecation, and something about dogs on leashes. We discovered in recent conversations — we finally have a pet policy after 13 years of discussions — that some people have an extreme fear of dogs, particularly off leash. The fears are often based on being bitten as children or having friends severely disfigured by dogs. It doesn't matter how small or how docile the dog. A dog is a dog. In DC we discovered that if we allowed a homeowner to have their dog "not within their immediate" control and the dog caused harm, the whole community was liable because we were in violation of the DC laws. Since laws change, instead writing a policy that addresses the law, append the law "for the convenience of members" but don't include it in your policy. You want to be free of liability if the law changes. Better to make it clear that is the pet owner's responsibility to know the current law. Animal law enforcement said that "under immediate control of the owner" included allowing someone else to walk the dog, for example. If a child walks the dog, the owner is responsible for any problems. The dog doesn't necessarily have to be on a leash but the owner needs to be close enough to grab the dog if if lunges at someone, and to know how much control a dog needs. If a dog has previously caused a problem and an owner allows it off leash, that would be viewed as being in violation. This sounds very anti-dog but I also see the problem from the dog's point of view. Children hurt dogs by stepping on their feet, pulling their tails or ears, etc. A hurt dog is going to justifiably defend themselves, but the child will be disfigured for life. I opt for the child being protected over the dog's perceived right not to be on a leash. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Pet Policy, (continued)
-
Re: Pet Policy Nancy Baumeister, July 1 2006
- Re: Pet Policy Ann Zabaldo, July 1 2006
-
Pet policy Fred H Olson, April 24 2012
-
Re: Pet policy Lautner, Patricia, April 24 2012
- Re: Pet policy Sharon Villines, April 24 2012
- Re: Pet policy R Philip Dowds, April 24 2012
- Re: Pet policy Diana Carroll, April 24 2012
- Re: Pet policy Sharon Villines, April 24 2012
- Re: Pet policy Sharon Villines, April 24 2012
-
Re: Pet policy Lautner, Patricia, April 24 2012
-
Re: Pet Policy Nancy Baumeister, July 1 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.