Re: Truly Capitalist Things | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Joel Rothschild (joel![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:05:13 -0700 (PDT) |
Questions about "ownership" /vs/. "sharing" loom so large at this
moment. The younger generations (mine and younger) are increasingly
willing to rent resources rather than own them. This reduces waste, but
also raises the specter of very powerful, rich landlords. (ZipCar,
AirBnb, and Uber rent out goods and services for profit, and they are
growing fat, bringing the potential for corporate abuses like we've
already seen from Uber.) It also raises the question, how will we build
wealth?
Meanwhile, older generations are burdened with too much ownership. In retirement, big houses get hard to maintain, car-dependency gets isolating (sometimes dangerous), and I read recently that for the boomers ownership has come with so much financing, average net worth isn't enough to buy even a modest house. I'm worried for my parents.
Cohousing inspires me because it's so much about balance and the sensible middle path. We need to find middle paths between extreme rentership and extreme ownership. The first step may be to stop thinking of renting and owning as irreconcilably opposed to each other. I'd love to hear what others think about this.
Joel Rothschild Ecovillage Developer Founder, Ecovillagers Cooperative http://www.ecovillagers.org +1 202 41 ROOTS (messages) +1 206 383 7804 (mobile) On 10/18/2015 06:16 AM, cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org wrote:
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:47:39 -0400 From: R Philip Dowds<rpdowds [at] comcast.net> To: Cohousing-L<cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Truly Capitalist Things Message-ID:<A91E7806-9BE9-4C2B-9C81-A401D651831C [at] comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Maybe. But I am aware of more than a couple cohousing communities that are convinced that tenant-occupied units devalue the property and make mortgages more difficult to secure ? and so, would much prefer a very high rate of owner occupancy. Meanwhile, at Cornerstone ? a high-density development in a high-density city, well served by transit within a few minutes walk ? I have tried hard to push for various schemes involving community-owned shared cars. The advantages are strong in my mind, but so far, no acceptance of this idea; people remain heavily attached to their ?personal? vehicles, which in turn seem essential to personal freedom and independence. We?ve still got a lot of work in front of us. This may in part be due to America as a competitive culture, rather than a collaborative one. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA>On Oct 17, 2015, at 2:08 PM, William New<wnew [at] stillcreek.net> wrote: > >And if we move homes/housing out of the_capitalist_ economy and into the_sharing_ economy, what happens then?? > >Ponder the emerging worldview of Millennials who are shunning personal ownership of houses and cars, embracing social sharing (e.g. Uber, AirBnB, cooperative financing), and redefining alternative models of career and education (to obviate indebtedness) ? ?co-housing? (largely a product of the Boomer culture as we know it) will likely morph to something beyond a ?truly capitalist thing?.
- Re: Truly Capitalist Things, (continued)
- Re: Truly Capitalist Things R Philip Dowds, October 19 2015
-
Re: Truly Capitalist Things Elizabeth Magill, October 18 2015
- Re: Truly Capitalist Things Sharon Villines, October 19 2015
- Re: Truly Capitalist Things Fred H Olson, October 19 2015
- Re: Truly Capitalist Things Joel Rothschild, October 21 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.