Re: Experience with allowing Home Based Businesses with Clients | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:50:36 -0800 (PST) |
> On Feb 25, 2016, at 2:19 PM, Alan O via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > silver sage village is an outlier when it comes to community and business. > ssv operates the common house as an enterprise. in a high cost area like > boulder, the ssv common house is a less expensive option when it comes to > meeting and office space: Our commonhouse is used too much to have ongoing enterprises too. Occasionally residents have given limited term classes, hosted office retreats and school fundraisers, and club meetings but other uses have not worked out. Our bylaws say short term rentals are not allowed. “Short term” is generally interpreted as “less than a month.” (When one of these issues comes up I do Google searches and find lots of helpful information — like the usual definition of “short term.” When we were amending our bylaws, we looked up odd paragraphs on the web to see if they were standard.) Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
Re: Experience with allowing Home Based Businesses with Clients Katie Henry, February 23 2016
- Re: Experience with allowing Home Based Businesses with Clients Fred H Olson, February 25 2016
-
Re: Experience with allowing Home Based Businesses with Clients Alan O, February 25 2016
- Re: Experience with allowing Home Based Businesses with Clients Sharon Villines, February 25 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.