bylaws-active vs inactive status | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: lienjud [at] aol.com (lienjud![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:26:23 -0700 (PDT) |
dear cohousing communities: I live at Cascadia Commons in Portland, and we might be facing a consensus decision where a household is asking for inactive status indefinitely and this household is not planning on leaving. They have not attended community/HOA meeting for the last 8 months. In preparation for this, I looked at our bylaws and it mentions active/inactive status and gives no definition for it. We have had households go on inactive status for health reasons, life changes, plans for moving out etc. There is vague language in our bylaws saying the community can decide the terms. So, some long-time members are saying that we have never set terms so there is no precedent for this household possibly being assessed $ or facing restrictions. I would wish for this vague language to be removed from our bylaws as it is meaningless and false advertising to potentially new members. Curious how things look in other communities. thanks for any information. Judith Lienhard
-
bylaws-active vs inactive status lienjud [at] aol.com, October 21 2022
- Re: bylaws-active vs inactive status Chris Roth - Communities Editor, October 22 2022
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.