Re: Ageism (was re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:04:29 -0800 (PST) |
> On Feb 22, 2023, at 6:02 PM, Lisa Kuntz <lisa.kuntz [at] > daybreakcohousing.org> wrote: > > I clearly missed some important parts of the convo! > > What does this mean? * 80 is not 65 just as 65 is not 50. Or 50 is not 35* This was from one of my posts in which I said since I was over 80 I no longer had an age category. Questionnaires and surveys normally stop at 65 or 65+. I was pointing out that 80 is not the same as 65. No one will ever know what is characteristic of people aged 80, if they never ask for anything older than 65. And similarly, being 65 is different than being 50, and 50 is just as different from 35. Sharon
-
Ageism (was re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18) Kate C, February 22 2023
-
Re: Ageism (was re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18) Lisa Kuntz, February 22 2023
- Re: Ageism (was re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18) Sharon Villines, February 23 2023
- Re: Ageism (was re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18) Lisa Kuntz, February 23 2023
-
Re: Ageism (was re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18) Lisa Kuntz, February 22 2023
- Re: Ageism (was re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 229, Issue 18) Annie Peace, February 22 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.