Deciding on Committee Members | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Melanie Mindlin (sassetta![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:04:20 -0800 (PST) |
I believe that committees with a lot of decision-making power, don’t always fare well when populated by volunteers. Once someone has volunteered, it’s hard to tell them that they’re not a good fit if they don’t decide this for themselves. Not a good fit might mean, for example, lacking in experience, biased, or divergent. When our community created a committee to decide how to spend monies in a fund designated for fixing post-construction problems, we decided to use a process we had learned from Sociocracy. We asked everyone at the meeting to nominate someone for the positions. We considered the number of nominations for different individuals and used a consensus process to propose and agree on the final members. There was a “popularity” or “voting” element to this, as it did hold significance if someone was nominated numerous times, but that is not how we decided. The committee ended up with great credibility and support for their decision-making. I know some people will wince at using a part of Sociocracy without the rest, but this was quite successful for us, and easy for everyone to understand. Hope this helps, Melanie > On Feb 8, 2024, at 3:16 AM, cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org wrote: > > Deciding on Committee Members
-
Deciding on Committee Members Earthlink Heidii, February 7 2024
- Re: Deciding on Committee Members Lauren, February 7 2024
- Re: Deciding on Committee Members Sharon Villines, February 8 2024
- Deciding on Committee Members Melanie Mindlin, February 8 2024
- Re: Deciding on Committee Members Sharon Villines, February 8 2024
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.