Preventing cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kathryn Lowry (kathryn.lowry![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 11:39:36 -0700 (PDT) |
Hello all, I’m seeking guidance on how cohousing communities keep “neighborly awareness” from drifting into surveillance—especially when it escalates to CPS calls. *Context (specific examples):* - Our site was intentionally designed so that *every resident can observe community activity from their kitchen window*—a feature we value for safety and connection. Yet my neighbors have repeatedly called CPS alleging neglect *because I rely on the same visibility feature they use* to scrutinize my children’s outdoor play. - During my *5th week of post-op recovery from knee surgery*, Dad was handling *100% of housekeeping and caregiving* for our two children and me (temporarily immobilized). During a sudden summer rain, a neighbor calmly walked our younger child toward our unit (Dad met them at the door) while another helped our older child close the sandbox—*no urgency, no distress*. Instead of being treated as a normal act of *neighborly care during a medically vulnerable period*, the incident was logged as *another CPS report* alleging neglect. *What I’m hoping to learn from this list:* 1. *Community Agreements:* Do you have written norms/policies that distinguish *mutual visibility for safety* from *surveillance of neighbors*? Sample language welcome. 2. *Reporting Protocols:* How do you channel concerns (e.g., speak directly first, use a community safety/children’s committee, mediation) before external reporting? Any *decision trees* or *cooling-off steps*? 3. *Privacy & Documentation:* Policies on photographing/recording neighbors or children, posting to social media, or keeping “incident logs”? 4. *Design Solutions:* Has anyone adjusted *sightlines, screening, signage, or play-zone placement* to reduce friction while preserving the original design intent of casual oversight? 5. *Family-Centered Practices:* Ways to support *children’s independent mobility* (e.g., kitchen-window check-ins, buddy systems) without shaming or over-policing parents—especially during *temporary medical events* when roles shift. 6. *Governance & Remedies:* Which committees handle this? What *restorative* or *educational* steps have you used (e.g., bias/assumption training, “assume positive intent” agreements, appreciative check-in channels) to reset culture? 7. *When CPS Is Involved:* If your community has faced *frequent or unfounded CPS calls*, how have you responded as a community while still honoring good-faith safety concerns? If you can share *policy excerpts, onboarding materials, signage language, or flowcharts*, I’d be grateful (on-list or off-list). I’m trying to *preserve our design’s intent—mutual care and informal connection—without normalizing surveillance* or weaponizing visibility against families. Thank you for any wisdom and documents you can offer, *Kathryn Lowry*
-
Preventing cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) Kathryn Lowry, October 11 2025
-
Re: Preventing cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) Diana Carroll, October 11 2025
-
Re: Preventing cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) Kathryn Lowry, October 11 2025
- Re: Preventing cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) Diana Carroll, October 11 2025
- Re: mediation in cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) Kathryn Lowry, October 11 2025
-
Re: Preventing cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) Kathryn Lowry, October 11 2025
-
Re: Preventing cohousing “neighborly awareness” from becoming surveillance (with CPS calls) Diana Carroll, October 11 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.