RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsanmicrosoft.com) | |
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 12:04 CDT |
Pablo Halpern wrote in response to a thread about developer designed cohousing: >The problem with developers creating "cohousing" is that of establishing the >cooperative culture. As Stuart Staniford-Chen has already said, strangers >moving into such a development are at the very beginning of the cohousing >process and may fail to truly develop a community. When potential members >approach our group, we let them know about the hard work expected of them in >the process of developing the community. Will the first residents of a >developer-created "cohousing community" be told the same thing? This is where the whole idea of expectations plays the key role. If the cultural image of cohousing is one where people work together, eat dinner together, and share resources to create a cooperative community then the cooperative culture is defined by those people making those expectations into their reality. The key is broadly establishing the cultural image of cohousing so that consumers who want that lifestyle can tell the difference. Its like knowing the difference between a mountain bike and a touring bike. If I want a mountain bike, I look for certain attributes that define it as a mountain bike and won't buy it at all if it doesn't have those attributes. Housing is a much much more scrutinized thing and people who want cooperative housing will quickly see through false advertising IF THEY KNOW THE DIFFERENCE. That is the key, defining the cohousing difference. In my opinion it is also not an either / or thing. You can have a little amount of cooperation or a whole lot. Even a little bit is better than none. If cohousing becomes the national marketing housing trend, I personally don't care if every development forms a true community. Even a little bit of working together cooperatively is a great place to start and starting small and working up to more cooperation seems to be a good beginning, especially if the tools and processes are easily accessible. Why can't every housing development have some social design built into it? Even if todays residents aren't interested maybe tomorrow's will be and it is up to us, the pioneers who are going whole hog in cooperative endeavor to show the rest of the country the benefits and strengths of what we are doing. Even if only a small amount of it is adopted, in my opinion, that is great progress. If I had say 100 grand to spend I'd put full page color ads describing cohousing in magazines like Ladies home journal and Redbook. The more we can get into the mainstream culture and show the benefits and sanity of living cooperatively the better. Again, not everyone will go whole hog, but even if they do only get together with their neighbors once a year, that is a starting place. The trick is to make them want it, and I think that is where the imagery of advertising can be used to its full effect to make people realize that their isolated, estranged reality is no longer good enough. Once that happens, developers will start changing the way they create housing and that will benefit everyone, whether they call it cohousing or not.
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please, (continued)
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Stuart Staniford-Chen, May 24 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Rob Sandelin, May 24 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Pablo Halpern, May 25 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Pablo Halpern, May 25 1994
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Rob Sandelin, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Jim Slotta, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please James Ausman, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please gkvontob, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please robyn, May 25 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.