Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: robyn (MANDERSECCVM.sunysb.edu) | |
Date: Wed, 25 May 94 16:59 CDT |
James (I think it was) brought up an interesting point that I'd been thinking about in regards to community and commitment, and wether one needs to have been there for the development of a community to be commited to it's maintainance -- and for that matter if expectations about the community a living situation offers can be/ or are enough to help the members create a community. Now, I've yet to live in a co-housing situation, I hope to soon but not yet. I have however, lived many years (I often think of it as having grown up in a communal living situation (student shared household) ), these situations may not seem all that similar to co-housing in many ways high turnover (low initial investment) but in other ways they may help us think aobut the questions brought up here. Some houses are just shared houses and little (or nothing more) a cheap place to live with an architecture that forces one to be rather close even intimately aware of the other people who live there. But it isn't the architecture that determines the character of a house, anyone who's lived in such houses knows the character is determined by the people, and the history of the house to some extent. Some houses are full of people you avoid, others are quickly (or slowly) family. The house I really felt commited to and really truly close to the other members of was an old house called the House of Entropy in Seattle (Rob do you know anything about them?) But, the original members who founded that place were all long gone when I got there, and what happened to the sense of community across the years I lived there was something of an ebb and flow of interest based on who had time and who felt attached to the place, but a certain amount always seemed to be maintined based on peoples attachement to the original intent of the place and who had been there when they moved in to convay to the new person the traditions of the house. I suspect simmilar things will occure with co-housing. Some will continue (if the current members teach new-comers well) and pick new people with care --- and some may like new houses of students set up at the begining of the year with no history and no guidance will fail utterly but others guided only by intuitions and expectations work. Though it's would be much much easier with someone to help guide early group processes, as it always seems to me that it's the way those early conflicts are handeled that seems to determine if a particular person becomes really commited to a place and it's people. gold forged in the fire of conflict I suppose. JUst my 2 cents, robyn Manderse [at] ccvm.sunysb.edu
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please, (continued)
- RE: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Rob Sandelin, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please Jim Slotta, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please James Ausman, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please gkvontob, May 25 1994
- Re: Cohousing, Communes, Community--Not for Profit! Please robyn, May 25 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.