Re: Monthly assessments | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ian Higginbottom (Ian.Higginbottomml.csiro.au) | |
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 94 11:52 CST |
Cascade Cohousing splits the running costs of our cohouse into two pools, "capital running costs" which are paid by unit owners in proportion to their "unit entitlement" and "community chest" running costs whichy are paid by residents. The former includes building maintenance, insurance, rates, taxes, capital improvements and those things generaly paid by the owner(s) of a house. The later includes heat and power for common house, some gardenning, tool maintenance,meeting costs (including child care) and such other expenses as are mormally paid by the residents of a house. This structure allows renters to pay their share of community chest costs directly and also allows the two types of costs to be split amongst the households in different ways. We easily reached consensus on the split of the capital assesments but are in the process of debating the fair split of the community chest monthly assesments. We have not decided whether to split these "community chest" monthly assesments on a per person or per household basis. I would appreciate hearing from those who have already posted their monthly assesment figures (and from those who are yet to post them) the logic behind their decision to charge on a per person or per household basis. Cheers Ian Higginbottom Cascade Cohousing Hig [at] ml.csiro.au
- Re: monthly assessments, (continued)
- Re: monthly assessments Rob Sandelin, April 25 1994
- Monthly assessments Rob Sandelin, November 3 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Donna Spreitzer, November 3 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Stephen Hawthorne, November 4 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Ian Higginbottom, November 7 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Rob Sandelin, November 7 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments Rob Sandelin, November 7 1994
- Re: Monthly assessments David L. Mandel, March 30 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.