housing options | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Victoria (victoriatrillium-hollow.org) | |
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 21:08:21 -0700 (MST) |
I'm inclined to agree with Chris Hanson re: cutting the role of the residents in the individual units. Of course the diversity of sites would make it necessary to have options to choose from: condos vs. houses for instance. I think it would be an amazing time and cost saver to have the group choose among some preplanned options along the lines Chris described, with all changes being saved for later remodels. (There is still PLENTY of work to do in building the community and common house.) I'm guessing that this would make cohousing something truly affordable and accessible to people with limited time and money, often the very people who stand to benefit the most. It amazes me that cohousing ever gets completed at all, given the blood, sweat and tears required. My guess is that for cohousing to be an REAL option for MANY people in our culture it is going to have to metamorphose a bit, so that the aforementioned people low on energy and money - often parents - can benefit. It seems likely that it is going to have to get easier somehow, or it will remain limited to a few. Chris's idea is worth exploring further. Vicky Leary Trillium Hollow Portland, Oregon
-
housing options Marya S. Tipton, February 9 2000
- Re: housing options Berrins, February 9 2000
- housing options Victoria, February 11 2000
- RE: housing options Rob Sandelin, February 12 2000
- Re: housing options Chris ScottHanson, February 12 2000
- RE: housing options Lashbrook, Stephan, February 12 2000
- Re: housing options Ann Zabaldo, February 13 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.