Leaving Meetings | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Gretchen Westlight (gren![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:01:37 -0600 (MDT) |
Dear Cohorts - In the 3 years that I've been involved with Cascadia Commons (Portland, Oregon), we've had occasional instances of someone leaving a business meeting because they were upset by the way a discussion was going. I have done it myself a couple of times, and witnessed others. What I'm wondering is how other groups address this. I'd like to make a distinction between a participant leaving a meeting because of disinterest (The Law of Two Feet), and a participant leaving because they were upset (unhappy, hurt, angry, etc.). I don't think of the former situation as a problem, but I personally believe that the latter one usually indicates a breakdown in the consensus process. I recognize that sometimes folks walk into a discussion on a difficult or intensely personal topic primed for conflict, and I don't think it's the group's responsibility to "rescue" them. However, any such departure has an impact on the remaining group, both for the rest of the meeting and beyond. If consensus is truly about bringing forth the wisdom of all in the circle, and someone leaves the circle, then we are not getting the complete thinking and therefore not making the best decision. Second- guessing an absentee doesn't ever cut it. A related aside: As a result of a big conflagration 1-1/2 years ago, we added a purple card to our consensus cards. We call it the "feeling" card, and it takes precedence over all others (part of our lesson from this particular conflict was how to humanize our business meetings). When someone raises a purple card, they get to express whatever feelings have come up for them, they are paraphrased/reflected until they feel heard (sometimes it takes more than one attempt ;-), we refer unresolved issues to committees or for future discussion (happens rarely), and we return to business. Lately folks have been apologizing and explaining if personal hurt results from incomplete information or misinterpretation, but generally we do not allow responses/reactions to someone else's purple card. It's a little awkward sometimes still, and requires additional checking in by the facilitator, but it allows for a fuller and more honest range of experience (emotions about business -- how unique!), and it has never sidetracked or derailed us. Since we've been using the purple cards, we've had far fewer show-stopping outbursts and departures. Anyhow, I'd like to know how other communities handle it when someone leaves a meeting because they are upset. Thanks for taking the time to share. - Gretchen Westlight P.S. Been in for a month now (we were the first to move in, the day after we got our keys). Still lots of boxes and residual stress, but I have definitely felt a "shift" in my relationships with others (especially those with whom I never socialized outside of meetings before). I am utterly and completely delighted in my 3yo daughter's responses to cohousing: her phsyical confidence at having a safe environment immediately outside our front door, her social intrepidness at visiting other folks (whether or not they have kids), and her astonishing ability to give informative tours (sometimes to resident members!). This is why I'm doing cohousing. No regrets yet, but still waiting for several policies to be agreed upon before I'm entirely comfortable. It's great to be here! -- gren [at] agora.rdrop.com Member of: Cascadia Commons Cohousing Portland, Oregon http://www.cascadiacommons.com
-
Leaving Meetings Gretchen Westlight, August 31 2000
- RE: Leaving Meetings Rob Sandelin, September 1 2000
- Re: Leaving Meetings Stuart Staniford, September 1 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.