Re: Group name, Project name, Domain name | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholson![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 08:14:28 -0600 (MDT) |
WRT changing names, using two names... On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Stuart Staniford stuart [at] silicondefense.com wrote: > > I think you should settle on a single brand and push that in all your > communications. If you use two different brands, it's confusing and you'll > waste time explaining the situation. > > If you are going to finally end up with the project name, you should > probably make a conscious effort to rebrand yourselves, and all stick to > the new name. IMO. YMMV. I agree. You might want to state "formerly Old Name" fairly prominently for a while after the change and have it in a less prominent place later (on your web site for example) to reduce the confusion. It's one of those unfortunate facts of nature that you need a name before it's possible to choose the best name. Fred -- Fred H. Olson fholson [at] cohousing.org Minneapolis,MN 55411 (612)588-9532 Amateur radio: WB0YQM List manager of: Cohousing-L and Nbhd-tc (Twin Cities Neighborhood issues list) More info: http://www.mtn.org/~fholson/sig-detail.htm
-
Group name, Project name, Domain name Brian Baresch, August 31 2000
- Re: Group name, Project name, Domain name Michael Donovan, August 31 2000
- re: Group name, Project name, Domain name Karen Schwalbe, August 31 2000
- Re: Group name, Project name, Domain name Stuart Staniford, September 1 2000
- Re: Group name, Project name, Domain name Fred H Olson, September 8 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.