RE: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: sbraun (sbraungmavt.net) | |
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:18:10 -0700 (MST) |
Hi Rob. Thanks for your interesting and enjoyable posts to this list. I really enjoy reading them. However, here we disagree, I think. It sounds like your acid test for community is a willingness to share cars. My own would be laughter. But a red flag goes up for me when an outsider makes a judgment about another community, or even makes a general judgment about what community should be. There is a hint of superiority about that. I wonder if there aren't people out there for whom what you call "just a condo" is really and truly deeply satisfying and life-enriching, and for whom the kind of community you find fulfilling would seem like a prison. There are many paths to happiness and fulfillment. We cohousers don't have a corner on the right way to live. Sheila Project Coordinator Champlain Valley Cohousing www.champlainvalleycohousing.org (802) 425-5030 phone (802) 425-5033 fax (802) 238-2667 cell > -----Original Message----- > From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l- > admin [at] cohousing.org] On Behalf Of Rob Sandelin > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:49 PM > To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Subject: RE: [C-L]_Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? > > I can show you a condo in Bellevue WA that has a brilliant cohousing > design, > pedestrian core, play area, nice community center that is central and easy > to look into from almost every unit. It even has a nice kitchen, although > not industrial grade. It has very little community. The neighbors are > pretty much still strangers, some after 5 years. It is nothing like a > cohousing community in terms of relationships. I asked my guide there if > she > felt comfortable asking to borrow a car. She looked at me like I was from > Mars. There is nothing there but the typical condo. > > So sorry, I do not believe in bricks and sticks having much to do with > community. Its not the architecture, its the people and their desires and > intentions that make cohousing what it is, a community by intention. > There > are hundreds of Intentional communities that are not cohousing,that have > good relationships and totally isolating architecture. If architecture > really was the key why do those places work? Because it is the intentions > of > the people do have those relationships. Take away that intention for > relationship from cohousing, and all you have left is a condo. In fact, at > least one cohousing group, common ground in Aspen, lost its intention and > became just another condo. There are a couple other cohousing groups which > have large percentage of the people who live there not involved, > apparently > uninterested in community. They just want a safe, cheap place to live. It > will interesting to see if those cohousing groups also don't just end up > as > condos. > > Rob Sandelin > > -----Original Message----- > From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org > [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Sharon Villines > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:36 AM > To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org > Subject: Re: [C-L]_Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? > > > On 11/20/02 2:12 PM, "Howard Landman" <howard [at] polyamory.org> wrote: > > > I believe that the design of the community can have an immense > > impact on the day-to-day functioning of it. Even something as simple as > > having the common house in the middle versus on one end can make a huge > > difference. > > The bricks and sticks are important as long as they are related to a > deeper > value, building economically, socially, and ecologically sustainable > communities. Intelligent investment in our personal spaces is a very > fundamental way of putting our money (time and thought) where our mouth > is. > Along with our hearts and feet. > > The bricks and sticks are one of the unique and defining characteristics > of > cohousing. > > Sharon > -- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- RE: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"?, (continued)
- RE: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? Rob Sandelin, November 22 2002
- Re: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? Sharon Villines, November 22 2002
- Re: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? Elizabeth Stevenson, November 22 2002
- Affordable housing is relative Rob Sandelin, November 23 2002
- RE: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? sbraun, November 23 2002
- RE: Do cohousers care about "bricks and sticks"? Fred H Olson, November 23 2002
- Acid test for community Rob Sandelin, November 23 2002
- RE: Acid test for community sbraun, November 23 2002
- RE: Acid test for community Rob Sandelin, November 24 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.