Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Howard Landman (howard![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:23:01 -0700 (MST) |
> It WOULD be stereotyping to say that "anyone who would prefer to live > without something is hostile to that things". However, I didn't say it, > You did. and I don't think I implied it, either. What I DID say was > that it makes sense for those who are hostile to children to live in > a place where there are no, or very few children. You implied, because you were replying to someone who simply said she didn't wish to live with children at this stage of her life, that such a person was necessarily or likely "hostile to children". Also, in a later email, you *insisted* on the term "hostility": > Just because you met people out of cohousing who feel > that way doesn't prove that it isn't hostility (Actually, it does. If you make a blanket statement that purports to be universally valid, then it only takes one counterexample to prove it false. He was responding to your original apparent position, but here you shifted your apparent position from "must be hostility" to "might be hostility sometimes".) I felt your choice of "hostile" was inflammatory, insulting, and not logically justifiable. It's a very strong and emotionally loaded term (see the definition below). And I'm not the only one who felt that. You don't seem aware that insulting people might cause a reaction. Or maybe you didn't expect anyone to feel insulted? Anyway, I was trying to point out that the (unstated) logic you appeared to be following simply didn't make sense. To do that, I had to state what you left unstated, that is, explicitly state the logical premise that you appeared to be using. Since you now say that you disagree with it as well, I'm puzzled about how you reached your conclusion. You leapt from "doesn't want to live with children" to "is hostile to children". How did you get there? Howard A. Landman River Rock Commons Fort Collins CO hostility, n: 1. a feeling of enmity, ill will, unfriendliness, etc.; antagonism. 2. (a) expression of enmity and ill will; active opposition; hostile act; (b) a state of war; acts of war; warfare. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ?, (continued)
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? racheli, February 17 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Howard Landman, February 17 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? racheli, February 18 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Sara A., February 18 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Howard Landman, February 19 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? racheli, February 19 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Grant McCormick, February 19 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? racheli, February 19 2003
- Re: Fifty Plus Cohousing + ? Grant McCormick, February 19 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.