Cohousing Principles and the Contradictions of Practice | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Greg Dunn (MyListsgregdunn.com) | |
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:07:00 -0700 (MST) |
I've recently run afoul of the very squishy guidelines for what constitutes on- and off-topic discussion on this list server, as enforced by the list moderator, Fred Olson. I asked Fred for clarification of those guidelines and he replied, and I quote, "Hmmm, if it is about cohousing it is on topic." That, to me, did not seem like a serious response, particularly given the breadth of discussions that take place here. In a subsequent message he said "you're right I dont have a well developed definition of what is on-topic, nothing extensive written down - some edges are quite gray." But again he made no further attempt to clarify. He subsequently suppressed a message of mine which I felt was very much appropo to the topic of discrimination that has been a primary theme for the past few weeks. I can appreciate that Fred volunteers his time to run this list, and has been doing so consistently for many years, and in so doing has helped many people to get connected to cohousing. Nevertheless, precisely *because* this list is the front-line of exploration of cohousing for many people, including me, it seems to me that it should be managed according to the principles espoused by the organization it represents. To quote from the "What is Cohousing?" article on The Cohousing Network's web site: "If your community has a leader that sets policy or establishes standards unilaterally, it is not cohousing." By that definition, it seems to me, this list server itself is "off-topic". I'd like to know how the rest of you feel about the issue of censorship of this list. Specifically: 1. Do you feel it's necessary or appropriate to have one person with absolute power to perform it? 2. Do you feel it appropriate that he should do so without providing any formal statement of the standards on which this censorship is based? 3. If you feel there should be formal standards, how do you feel those standards should be created? I don't mean to kick up a fuss, but this list hasn't been working for me lately. I almost simply unsubscribed a few minutes ago, but then read Sheila Braun's posting about discrimination, which somehow made me feel I ought to at least run this up the flagpole before I walk away. Thank you for your consideration. Greg Dunn _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- RE: fifty plus cohousing, (continued)
-
RE: fifty plus cohousing TR Ruddick, February 19 2003
-
Re: RE: fifty plus cohousing racheli, February 19 2003
- Monoculture sbraun, February 20 2003
-
Discrimination (for any reason) sbraun, February 19 2003
- Cohousing Principles and the Contradictions of Practice Greg Dunn, February 19 2003
- Re: Cohousing Principles and the Contradictions of Practice Sara A., February 19 2003
- Re: Cohousing Principles and the Contradictions of Practice Art Gorski, February 20 2003
- Re: Cohousing Principles and the Contradictions of Practice Christine Johnson, February 21 2003
-
Re: RE: fifty plus cohousing racheli, February 19 2003
- Re: Discrimination (for any reason) racheli, February 19 2003
-
RE: fifty plus cohousing TR Ruddick, February 19 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.