Re: Re: Consensus in cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 12:26:13 -0600 (MDT) |
On 8/07/2003 8:48 PM, "Peg Blum" <pegb [at] cambridgecohousing.org> wrote: > In general, the process has worked well. Except when deciding what colors > to paint the dining room and some other spaces in our common house. (And I > dread the day when our exterior HardeePlank will need repainting....) On this stuff, like colors, we put out the choices (usually narrowed by a team) and then 1. Attach a paper ballot that has two options -- "I like this" and "I can't live with this". 2. People put an check mark for I like this and an x for I can't live with this. 3. Any choice with an X goes out unless there are a lot of "I like this" votes as well then we try to discuss it. Often the one or two x's were not strong. Other times they noticed something that the Likes hadn't noticed and the balance sways. This has worked very well for us and produced very good long long lasting results. Excellent chair choices, for example, and it took a long time to find a choice we agreed on. We use it for anything people want to hang in the commonhouse. The only time (in my opinion) that it did not work well was when a very favorite choice of tile for the kitchen was withdrawn after the balloting for very good reasons (too rough to clean easily). But this was not announced and those people were not allowed to comment on the other two choices before the tiles were purchased. The buyers had bought the second favorite but since most people had voted for the deleted favorite, in fact, the third favorite would have been the first favorite, and probably triggered another choice that was more acceptable to everyone. Collecting comments and following through on a well-communicated process are key to making potentially crazy-making decisions quickly and well. Consensus does not mean everyone has to show up in a meeting and say "I do." It only means that everyone has a fair opportunity to register objections and have them respected. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Re: HardeePlank (was Consensus in cohousing), (continued)
- Re: Re: HardeePlank (was Consensus in cohousing) Sharon Villines, August 8 2003
- Re: Re: HardeePlank (was Consensus in cohousing) Matt Lawrence, August 8 2003
- Re: Re: HardeePlank Laura Fitch, A.I.A., August 8 2003
- Re: Re: HardeePlank Matt Lawrence, August 8 2003
- Re: Re: Consensus in cohousing Sharon Villines, August 8 2003
- Re: Consensus in cohousing Jeanne Goodman, August 10 2003
- RE: Consensus in cohousing Rob Sandelin, August 27 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.