RE: individual "sponsorship" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: TR Ruddick (truddick![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:07:07 -0600 (MDT) |
I'm trying to summarize this discussion, which has evidently generated more traffic than anything else recently. Some communities think that a person who wants to buy something out-of-pocket for the community--conditional on the community approving the purchase--ought to be thanked. Others think that such a purchase destroys a little of the cohesiveness of the community. I have not seen anyone who suggested that the individual might, for example, purchase the hot tub (or whatever) and install it on personal dwelling space in the community, then invite everyone to use it at will. I'm aware that some communities are more liberal about what members do with their own dwellings than others, and in some places an individual who wants a hot tub would be denied the opportunity to install one under any circumstances (unless it was indoor furnishing, I guess). I personally would find such an environment to be too controlling for my idiosyncratic nature, but others might prefer regimentation at that level. In the end what we're discussing here is an extension of the old tension between individual autonomy and community control, aren't we? I don't think there's an absolute "right" or "wrong" in that dichotomy, just a range of individual preferences. TR Ruddick Dayton Cohousing _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.