Meeting attendance and proxies | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferous![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:31:44 -0700 (MST) |
In a collaborative process you have to decide how much to outreach to people who are not present. Many communities use a buddy system, people who are not present at a meeting hear about the details of the meeting from their buddy. This system of course then filters the meeting through other peoples perspectives but it does add a human connection which for community building is a good thing. Sometimes this human element will bring someone back into the meeting structure. Especially if you just report, no guilt trips. Some groups have a very up front check out process, where a person clearly indicates in some way, that they will NOT be participating in this decision, they give way to the group. As part of this process those who check out are discouraged from criticizing. This is reasonable and fair. A proxy can be done two ways. One way is an absentee vote, another way is where one participant gives their decision making power to another. In the latter, if I can not attend the meeting, I spend time with another person, make sure they understand my input and ideas, then empower them to represent those ideas for me at the meeting. Again, this adds a human element to the process, which I think is better than reading a note or letter, which of course is another way to represent yourself at a meeting you can not attend. If large numbers of people in your community do not attend meetings consistently it is my advice to find out why. There may be nothing that will change in the situation but at least you will know. I visited a community once who required a written notice from anyone not attending a community meeting. They were cute, sad, angry and all were read for everyone to hear. One of the foundational experiences I had once was attending a meeting of the Gesuntite foundation (Not sure how to spell that word). When I arrived people were making paper puppets, simple things, although some folks had got there early to make more elaborate ones. During the meeting, for which some heavy stuff came up, people talked with, through, and acting out with their puppets. It was silly, warm, humorous, intense and enormously fun. At the end of the 4 hour meeting I was astonished to read on the chalkboard how many things had been decided by the "puppet government". I walked away realizing the power of creative fun and have been preaching that ever since. IF YOU MAKE MEETINGS FUN, PEOPLE WILL COME. If meetings leave you with a stomach ache, people will stay away. If 80% of your membership comes to parties, but only 40% comes to meetings, then make your meetings into parties. Rob Sandelin South Snohomish County at the headwaters of Ricci Creek Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> Field skills training for student naturalists Floriferous [at] msn.com http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Handling conflict Anna Fallon, February 15 2004
-
Re: Handling conflict Sharon Villines, February 15 2004
-
RE: Handling conflict Rob Sandelin, February 17 2004
- Meeting attendance and proxies Rob Sandelin, February 20 2004
- Re: Meeting attendance and proxies Elizabeth Stevenson, February 20 2004
- Re: Meeting attendance and proxies Sharon Villines, February 20 2004
- NW Sustainability conference, May 1 Seattle Rob Sandelin, April 19 2004
- Re: NW Sustainability conference, May 1 Seattle Stephen Waters, April 19 2004
-
RE: Handling conflict Rob Sandelin, February 17 2004
-
Re: Handling conflict Sharon Villines, February 15 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.