RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Alexander Robin A (alexande.robiuwlax.edu) | |
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:18:31 -0800 (PST) |
I think this is an excellent suggestion. It is critical to plan and build it in during the construction phase. Doing something like this after the units are built is sooo much harder. In one past life, my wife and I build a house on a farm and had networking wired in, all going to a central hub. Even though we were not connected to other houses, it made our local area network very convenient. Could plug my portable in in any room for instance. Our electrician didn't even charge extra for installing the computer wiring. Here at Eon Commons the houses were not build with wiring installed. We are trying to construct a wireless network for the community but it's rough going. Call me old fashioned, but I'll take wired over wireless at least for the present. Robin Alexander Eno Commons ________________________________ From: Perry_rg [mailto:peregryn2356 [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Wed 3/16/2005 1:13 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Latest on Community-wide data systems Joel, If I might make a suggestion. I would recommend that your community consider implementing what is known as "structured wiring". One way this might be implemented would be for each home to have a house distribution center, where all the data (network and cable TV) cabling and phone cabling from each connection point or wall jack in the house is terminated in a patch panel in the house distribution center. Then, each home's distribution center is connected by the appropriate cabling (probably underground) back to a central distribution center, perhaps in the common house. The contracted service (Internet access, cable TV, phone) would come into the central distribution center and then be distributed as agreed upon to each home. As I see it, there are a number of advantages to a system such as this. Everyone's home in the community could have access to a common data network, allowing resources such as laser printers and network data storage to be shared. The community cable TV network could include closed-circuit TV and shared satellite TV service, in addition to cable TV service. There could be a common multi-line phone system, allowing features such as paging and voice mail between community homes. The idea is that implementing structured wiring would provide sufficient capability to accommodate future technology and be flexible in configuration (by virtue of the cross-connection patch panels in each distribution center). Most companies are wired this way, and some higher-end homes are also wired in a similar fashion. There are several companies that make home distribution center systems, Leviton being one of them. But, if you can work with a contractor that knows what they are doing, or if you have someone in the cohousing community that is knowledgeable about networking, telephone systems, and cable TV distribution, it would be possible to assemble distribution systems and run or specify the cabling yourselves. If people are interested in pursuing this sort of project, I am available for consultation. I will also do what I can to answer questions on this forum, hopefully without overwhelming people with the technical details. Perry Godwin Thelema Networks P.O. Box 25005 Lansing, MI 48909-5005 Phone: (517)485-2544 x3 Email: peregryn2356 [at] yahoo.com Joel Plotkin <joel [at] sunyit.edu> wrote: Dear folks: I've checked the archives on community data systems (cable TV and Internet access) and found the 1997 technical data very helpful, as well as the 2002 information. Are there any list members who have more recent information in this fast-moving field? Hundredfold Farm in Cashtown PA is a rural cohousing project with 14 planned homes. We'd like to find a way to get our data and TV without being reliant on the big communication companies. Does anyone have experience with community- owned satellite access? We have heard one opinion that direct satellite links are undesirable for Internet access because they do not come with adequate firewalls (but this is from someone who subcontracts with the Pentagon). What about the big dishes that were popular fifteen years ago for TV? They required decoders, but not monthly maintenance fees. We hope to WiFi our system, since we're all located close together. Reply on or off list. Joel Plotkin _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems, (continued)
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems normangauss, March 17 2005
-
Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems Robert Heinich, March 16 2005
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems normangauss, March 16 2005
- Re: Latest on Community-wide data systems Perry_rg, March 16 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Alexander Robin A, March 16 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Fred H Olson, March 17 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Perry_rg, March 17 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Robert Heinich, March 17 2005
- RE: Latest on Community-wide data systems Perry_rg, March 17 2005
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.