Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kathryn McCamant (kmccamant![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:01:45 -0700 (PDT) |
Interesting.... Here at Nevada City Cohousing we take a different approach. We moved in 8 years ago, and drew from the experience of many other communities before us. Community laundry, including laundry soap, is free to all members. Our theory is that community laundry is the number one thing that brings people thru the common house all times of the day and nite, and we want to encourage people to use it. People can have their own laundry at home, but use of the community laundry is always available, paid out of HOA dues. I'm guessing at least half of the 34 homes use the common house as their only laundry. Our community internet system--two fast lines into a server in the common house--then out to every house--is also part of our HOA dues. While originally we had a few hold outs that didn't want this included in the dues, we've found that everyone boast about it when it comes to resales so it is now just included in the dues. We are not charging for use of the common house guest rooms. I like the idea of a suggested donation for their use.....maybe someday we'll get around to talking about that....especially as a way to pay for new sheets and occassional deep cleanings. Katie Nevada City Cohousing Previously of Doyle St Cohousing -- Kathryn McCamant, President, Architect CoHousing Partners, LLC 241 Commercial Street Nevada City, CA 95959 T.530.478.1970 C.916.798.4755 www.cohousingpartners.com On 4/1/14 6:50 PM, "Muriel Kranowski" <murielk [at] vt.edu> wrote: > >We do charge for using the CH laundry equipment - 50 cents for the >washer, and the dryer cost was just raised to 80 cents IIRC, to >encourage people to hang up their clothes to dry. The charge is >supposed to be just enough so machines can be replaced when they >fail. I believe that a minority of our residents use the CH laundry >room, though it can be handy at times as Liz says even if you have >your own W&D as most of us do. > >We also charge for use of the guest rooms and I'm glad we do. Some >people use them a great deal, because their parents and/or siblings >live close enough to visit frequently; others of us scarcely use them >at all. I think it's fair to ask people to pay for this amenity to >defray the cost of using the rooms. We employ a cleaning person to do >serious cleaning in the guest-room area once a month, and we need to >replace bed & bath linens every so often. My neighbors who are barely >making it financially shouldn't have to subsidize much better off >members who heavily use the guest rooms, IMO. > >We have a community-wide internet arrangement via a T-1 line, but I >don't know how it works from a technical standpoint. I think at this >point all the homes are hard-wired for it - I recall the front yards >being dug up to lay conduit a few years ago. The T-1 started as a >private initiative rather than a community good, as just a subgroup >wanted it at first, and we still treat it that way in the way we pay >for it, by each household that wants it. It started when a resident >who needed high-speed and reliable internet service as a telecommuter >arranged to get it and share it with those who wanted it. The cost >has dropped over time to be really cheap. Last year it cost $36 for >the year; this year, in order to pay for a piece of equipment, it was >raised to $72 for the year. Most outages (rare as they are) are due >to factors outside our control, but someone is always on top of it - >I think we have 2 tech-gurus at this point. They help newbies as >needed, and also help non-techies who need to install a new router or the >like. > >We don't offer our own ISP - we did at one point, but it was not >universally used. When the guy who was running it moved away, the >next techie-in-charge closed it down. About 10 people still have an >email account related to that ISP but are actually getting their >email through a Google service (a grandfathered arrangement), the >rest of us are on our own. > > Muriel at Shadowlake Village, Blacksburg, VA > >_________________________________________________________________ >Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service, (continued)
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Elizabeth Magill, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service R.P. Aditya, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Sharon Villines, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Muriel Kranowski, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Kathryn McCamant, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Sharon Villines, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Sharon Villines, April 1 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Ann Zabaldo, April 2 2014
- Re: Costs for Shared Services [was Shared community internet service Muriel Kranowski, April 2 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.