Re: Vote or Stand aside? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:28:59 -0800 (PST) |
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Ann Zabaldo <zabaldo [at] earthlink.net> wrote: > > If what you want is a yes or no answer then vote. If what you want is a > solution then do use the time and energy of the group to come up with A > solution. I agree with Ann. The reason to have a meeting is to discuss and amend the proposal to improve it or change it or decide to start over. That is a process. If all you want to do is present the proposal and vote or call for consensus, that can be done on email. Or SurveyChimp. We have people who want the proposals all vetted with everyone before they come to the meeting. They effectively want to avoid the group consensus process where everyone understands the objections and needs of others as part of their own decision-making process. Meetings are where you hear why others are objecting or consenting — people can consent for very bad reasons. It’s usually important to play out the process together because this process is also one of getting to know each other. Of building relationships. Otherwise why have a meeting at all? Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: Vote or Stand aside?, (continued)
- Re: Vote or Stand aside? R Philip Dowds, November 9 2015
- Re: Vote or Stand aside? Sharon Villines, November 9 2015
-
Re: Vote or Stand aside? Eris Weaver, November 9 2015
-
Re: Vote or Stand aside? Ann Zabaldo, November 9 2015
- Re: Vote or Stand aside? Sharon Villines, November 9 2015
-
Re: Vote or Stand aside? Ann Zabaldo, November 9 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.