Re: Fwd: Next to the highway | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Joel Woodhull (jwoodhull![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 95 23:25 CST |
I would like to know which cohousers would be willing to give up the right to roar past other people's dwellings in return for the peace and tranquility they usually seek in cohousing. Generally speaking, the more tranquil the site, the more likely every resident is to drive, and to drive past greater numbers of other dwellings along the way. The search for tranquility, coupled with the automobile that makes living in distant areas possible, is the cause of the suburban sprawl that many of us abhor. In the specific case of the Peninsula project, the institutional underpinning of the conspiracy is Caltrans, which persists in adding more lanes to their highways rather than building the soundwalls that most people would prefer. The project is within walking/cycling distance of a downtown frequently cited as a model for reversing suburban sprawl, a Caltrain Station, and a future light rail station. To make it more desirable for people to live there and take advantage of those more environmentally benign transportation alternatives, it would be only fair that the rest of the people of California, through their taxes, should contribute to those sound walls. Good luck to the Peninsula Housing Partners in their difficult and admirable endeavor. I hope Rita decides that the noise problems are manageable and signs up. Joel Woodhull Pasadena
-
Fwd: Next to the highway Joaniblank, January 28 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Joel Woodhull, January 29 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Evan Hunt, January 29 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Joel Woodhull, January 30 1995
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Next to the highway tom ponessa, January 31 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.