Fwd: Next to the highway | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Joaniblank (Joaniblank![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 95 21:22 CST |
Responding to Rita's question about a site very close to a freeway--(luckily for you all, I don't know how to post direct quotes): I would certainly be concerned about air quality at that site, but I have a little different take on the noise situation. I think that cohousing can go a long way to humanizing any residential property/site. Part of the reality of living in the burbs these days are that some of the folks who live there have to live close to freeways, or even (does anyone remember) railroad tracks. And those who chose to live in an urban area--as I have--know that their homes will be noisier than if they were farther from downtown. I know, I know, the constant sound of freeway traffic is a sound of a different type/stripe, but it is still a sound that most can learn to ignore, particularly if signifigant mitigations are included in the design. Although I feel sure that many, perhaps most, cohousing groups will want peace and tranquility at their site, there are a few of us excitement junkies, who might actually be willing or even eager to trade increased noise for the convenience, resources and hustle/bustle of an urban place, or even a suburban one next to a freeway. Believe me, if I needed or wanted to live in the suburbs, I'd sure rather do it in cohousing than any other way. 'Smatter of fact, having lived in cohousing (Doyle St.) 2 1/2 years, I'm quite sure I'll not ever want to live any other way, be it city, suburban or rural (at the moment, my last choice). Joani Blank --------------------- Forwarded message: Subj: Next to the highway Date: 95-01-28 22:08:05 EST From: Joaniblank To: couhousing-l [at] uci.com Responding to Rita's question about a site very close to a freeway--(luckily for you all, I don't know how to post direct quotes): I would certainly be concerned about air quality at that site, but I have a little different take on the noise situation. I think that cohousing can go a long way to humanizing any residential property/site. Part of the reality of living in the burbs these days are that some of the folks who live there have to live close to freeways, or even (does anyone remember) railroad tracks. And those who chose to live in an urban area--as I have--know that their homes will be noisier than if they were farther from downtown. I know, I know, the constant sound of freeway traffic is a sound of a different type/stripe, but it is still a sound that most can learn to ignore, particularly if signifigant mitigations are included in the design. Although I feel sure that many, perhaps most, cohousing groups will want peace and tranquility at their site, there are a few of us excitement junkies, who might actually be willing or even eager to trade increased noise for the convenience, resources and hustle/bustle of an urban place, or even a suburban one next to a freeway. Believe me, if I needed or wanted to live in the suburbs, I'd sure rather do it in cohousing than any other way. 'Smatter of fact, having lived in cohousing (Doyle St.) 2 1/2 years, I'm quite sure I'll not ever want to live any other way, be it city, suburban or rural (at the moment, my last choice).
-
Fwd: Next to the highway Joaniblank, January 28 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Joel Woodhull, January 29 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Evan Hunt, January 29 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Joel Woodhull, January 30 1995
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Next to the highway tom ponessa, January 31 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.