Re: Fwd: Next to the highway | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Evan Hunt (evanh![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 95 00:42 CST |
> In the specific case of the Peninsula project, the institutional > underpinning of the conspiracy is Caltrans, which persists in > adding more lanes to their highways rather than building the > soundwalls that >>most people would prefer.<< I agree with almost all of your message, but I couldn't let this go by without saying how much I _hate_ soundwalls. Hate, hate, hate. There's something to be said for peace and quiet in the vicinity of freeways, but there's also something to be said for encouraging the sanity of people who have to drive on the things. A freeway without soundwalls gets some glimpse of life and nature; drivers can still feel connected to the world. Soundwalls make a freeway look like a cattle chute in a slaughterhouse, sterile yet vicious, completely cut off from any reality beyond the roadway. All they need is advertisements and the landscape of Gilliam's _Brazil_ has come true. Trees and hedges do a pretty good a job of acoustically insulating a road, and they aren't inhuman. They do take time to grow, unfortunately, but if it was my house going up next to a road, I'd resign myself to putting up with the noise for the few years it would take, and save the motorists from the blight of another soundwall. If I needed the wall immediately, I'd think about an earthen berm. A soundwall might be all I could afford, but it'd be my last choice.
-
Fwd: Next to the highway Joaniblank, January 28 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Joel Woodhull, January 29 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Evan Hunt, January 29 1995
- Re: Fwd: Next to the highway Joel Woodhull, January 30 1995
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Next to the highway tom ponessa, January 31 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.