Re: Community and Environmentalism | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 25 May 95 11:33 CDT |
Environmentalism is one of those values which often can lead to disagreements, even conflicts due to the passions of the holders of those values. I would suggest, that if you are framing a community around environmental values that you clearly state what that means in practical terms, in your visions document. I have read about 15 vision statements from groups which have ideas about environmental stuff in them, most of which were enormously vague and general. This is OK, but having definition is good too. For example: We want to live lightly on the land..... Is a nice vague, conceptual statement, open to any sort of interpretation. Example 2: gives a little more definition. We want to live lightly on the land by minimizing disturbance of native vegetation during building, transplanting native vegetation where possible, minimizing pets predations on wildlife, and preserving a maximum amount of greenbelt as a land trust, forever in its wild state. If the founders of the group hold values which they want to endure, you have to clearly communicate those values to everyone who comes aboard and ask that new comers accept the values of the community. It is usually a mistake to try and formulate values after the community is together, because of the lowest common denominator effect which Eric Hart mentioned. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood.
-
Re: Community and Environmentalism Fred H Olson WB0YQM, May 25 1995
- Re: Community and Environmentalism Rob Sandelin, May 25 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.